Monday, 25 July 2016

Why Microsoft + LinkedIn Deal is not just about them both?

Why Microsoft + LinkedIn Deal is not just about them both?



While most people say Microsoft made a good bet with its money, keeping LinkedIn for what it is, will be as important as extracting value out of what LinkedIn can bring to Microsoft.

Microsoft + LinkedIn deal is not just about them both.

 $26.2 bill = $60.5 per User.


Some may say while all LinkedIn users are not worth $60.5 that Microsoft paid per User, a lot of the professionals are worth a lot more.

In the end, if Microsoft does not want this deal to go the way its Nokia deal went, it should all be about how the Giant makes it sweet for Users.


So, What's in it for the LinkedIn User? For U & Me?

Here is my list of what are the Positives, Negatives and Unknowns from the Microsoft+LinkedIn deal for us.






Hope both @Microsoft @LinkedIn they build on +ves!

HONEY, what if you made some PROFIT? .... When would Investors ask #Cloud leaders, the aging startups to make profits?

HONEY, what if you made some PROFIT? .... When would Investors ask #Cloud leaders, the aging startups to make profits?
 2 distinct #Clouds are visible on the Tech Horizon these days. 

1. One is our fav ‘As a Service’ #Cloud of a various types offered by the (aging?) #CloudComputing leaders, which is used by regular business and consumers.   
2. The other #Cloud is used only by Investors and refers to how they compute returns from Cloud Companies – let us calls it #ReturnsCompute Cloud.    Stay focused on it.

The Investor dream
How do Investors generate returns?  Some of our #Cloud leaders, despite being in their teens, neither make profit nor declare dividends. So where does that leave Investors?  Enter the 
#ReturnsCompute Cloud, used by Investors.

#ReturnsCompute Cloud, is a dream that most Investors live with.   The dream covers topics like Stock Price and its movement. Returns are computed by estimating the cumulative stockholder return on common stock over a period of time. By extension, one can compare this return with the cumulative return of the S&P 500 Index on an investment of $100 over the same time period, along with re-investment of profits / dividends.  However, profits & dividends are rare in our Cloud World. 

Am I generating returns based on Stock price growth?
That is the primary question, and some may go beyond.   If one goes beyond, there might be a couple of follow up Questions.   How long is long enough for Investors to stay content with and live off Stock Price growth?  When would Investors start demanding Real Profits from the Cloud Companies?

To choose Growth over Profit is an old practice, as old as business itself.  Long term Investors however, used to have a timeframe or a threshold size in mind – a point in time beyond which, not making profit wasn’t considered cool.  So, how are the investors in today’s #Cloud companies different?  While Investors don’t seek to develop Profit making habits, some of the Cloud companies could be spending more money on sales and marketing chasing growth than on innovation and product development. This could hurt them in the long run.


Why Profits? Why hurry? 5 to 10 years is too short. Give them more time.
There is a lot of content on the web arguing both ‘for and against’ demanding profits and dividends from the #Cloud Companies.  

Most analysts produce content that asks one to “Let the Situation Be.”   They tell us to visualize how today’s Cloud Companies are building products for future, and creating value.  They confirm that we are better off making money from the stock price movement of today’s Cloud Companies. Mind you there could be companies that may even report faster growth in stock price than in revenue.  These analysts encourage us to forget the bubbles of the past.  It feels good to imagine, this trend is for real.    

Here is a list of some of my fav companies.  I admire them for being trend setters and creating new markets. 

WORKDAY
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Revenue ($ Billion)
0.1344
0.274
0.469
0.788
1.162
Net Loss ($ Billion)
-0.079
-0.119
-0.173
-0.246
-0.289

Workday doesn’t double revenues every year anymore.  It also doesn’t anymore threaten to dethrone Oracle and SAP from HCM market space.  But it is still reporting impressive revenue growth rates of 35%+ and might continue to do so into 2020.  Without ever thinking of dividend, $100 invested in Class A common stock of Workday in Y2012 could be worth $129.4 in 2016.


Salesforce
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Revenue ($ Billion)
2.266
3.050
4.071
5.373
6.667
Net Loss ($ Billion)
-0.0115
-0.270
-0.232
-0.262
-0.047

Salesforce is slowing down with its core Sales Cloud business, but still manages above 30% growth rates with other offerings.  It would probably set history as the first SaaS company hitting $ 10 Billion run rate before 2020. Without ever thinking of dividend, $100 invested in Salesforce stock in Y2011 could be worth $211 in 2016.



NetSuite
2012
2013
2014
2015
Revenue ($ Billion)
0.309
0.415
0.556
0.741
Net Loss ($ Billion)
-0.035
-0.060
-0.100
-0.124

NetSuite is maintaining 30%+ growth rates and looks poised to repeat the performance for a few more years. It is working hard on markets outside US and positioning itself as ‘the most optimal Cloud Enterprise App alternative’ to Oracle and SAP in the world of medium sized businesses.  Without ever thinking of dividend, $100 invested in Netsuite stock in Y2010 could be worth $338 in 2015. 

As an admirer, I also worry about their profit making habits.  The profit numbers graphic doesn't look pretty.


Time to learn from the past bubbles?

I am worried that my fav aging, non-profit making and market share chasing companies might be hit by more young and nimble competition.  Market forces after all.  There are other Investors buying into the virtues of #ReturnsCompute Cloud and pumping money building up other market share chasing companies. And, when growth levels dip into teens for the established players, the #ReturnsCompute Cloud might burst. Time to learn from the past bubbles?



Note: I am not discussing Cloud business of or investments by biggies like Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, Amazon and Google. They don’t publish separate results for Cloud.  I would prefer to assume they do make enough Profits elsewhere to invest and chase market share for Cloud products.

Thursday, 26 May 2016

My Ready Reckoner - If You Ever Wanted to refer to a Point of View on Top Cloud Players

My Ready Reckoner - If You Ever Wanted to refer to a Point of View on Top Cloud Players
The Field is crowded.  There are lists of Top Cloud Players.  However these lists do not paint a good enough picture for me.

Some Cloud Players are good at some pieces of the puzzle; some have all the pieces of the puzzle. Some have built the pieces of the Cloud on their own and some have just acquired.  Some Cloud Players are Enterprise Class while some others are more SME friendly.  Some Cloud Players are continuously investing, whereas some others are running out of money.







Is there a place to go to and pick up a view
 on Top Cloud Players and get answers to the following Big Qs?

• Who are the Players at the Top who get referred to in many of the Cloud Players lists?
• Do these Players play across the Cloud Spectrum, SaaS (Apps) – PaaS (Platforms) – IaaS (Compute Infra, Storage & Network)
• Do they have a good eco-system of Partners who extend their offerings giving me additional choices?
• Have these Players invested and playing for the long term – so my commitments with them can be long term?
• Are they acquiring and consolidating market presence and bringing in features?
• Do they bring Enterprise Class Apps, Platform and Infra?
• Are they flexible enough with Pay-as-you-go or will I be driven to upfront Pay Commitments?

There is no place to go to get a view without reading tonnes of content.  So I prepared one for myself, here it is.


A Point of View on Top Cloud Vendors - Ready Reckoner – to answer those Big Qs.

My Ready Reckoner - If You Ever Wanted to refer to a Point of View on Top Cloud Players


Cloud Player
SaaS !
PaaS !
IaaS !
Remarks
Amazon
    Does not offer SaaS on its own
    However, check out 3rd Party products offered via AWS SaaS Partner Program
    Quickly gaining market share
    Specializing in Mobile, Analytics & IoT dev platforms
    Makes Partner Products available as Platforms for subscribe & use
    Early entrant, creator & Leader of the market
    20%+ market share of 20B+ market in 2016
    Primarily an IaaS player
    Built from scratch with a vision to sell as a service
    Industry benchmark for Compute & Storage offerings and price points
Salesforce
    Early entrant & trend setter in CRM space
    Does not seem to have appetite to invest & expand into building  Apps in other  functional areas
    Evolved into a leading PaaS Playerwith Force.com
    Introducing IoT solutions too
    Does not seem keen on this area at this time
    SaaS & Paas Player
    Leader in SaaS revenues
    PaaS Offering is growing fast
    Partner Marketplace App Exchange offers add-on choices
Oracle
    Leading Player with Enterprise Class SaaS Apps. Invested heavily to build ground up SaaS suite. Large Client base.
    Covers all of HCM, Fin, SCM, Proc
    Continues to re-build all EBS/PSFT modules to SaaS 
    Also acquiring products to offer Industry specialization
    Enterprise Class offering in place
    Dominant Leader in Development Platform Products space
    Keen to convert leadership from Oracle Database, Middleware, Sun-Java, Weblogic into PaaS dominance
    IoT Solutions are picking up
    Enterprise grade Infra strength from the Sun acquisition
    Later entrant. Might stay content to be seen as End2End Cloud Player by its large incumbent client base & use IaaS to deploy its PaaS based landscape, and On-Prem customers
    End2End Cloud Player
    Criticized Cloud a few years back. Now Invested heavily & talks only about Cloud (Fusion Apps)
    Successful with extending home grown offerings with acquisitions like Taleo, Eloqua
    Large Partner Marketplace offers add-on choices
Microsoft
    Office 365 is seeing big growth as SaaS
    Dynamics ERP, CRM Online, Sharepoint, are available
    Check out Azure Web Apps Marketplace for 3rd Party Apps
    Does not seem to build ground up SaaS solutions in other areas
    Azure offers every dev tool Microsoft has - .Net, Java, Python, Ruby..
    Specializing in Mobile, Analytics, IDM & Integration Areas
    IoT & Cortana based Bigdata Analyticscould see big growth
    Late entrant. Playing Catch up with AWS. Investing heavily into creating Infra in various regions of the world (30+)
    Offers all Compute, Storage & Networking
    End2End Player for SME market
    IaaS could be big focus areas in near future
IBM
    Offerings coverAnalytics (Watson, Cognos) Commerce(CRM, Merchandising, Proc, Payments) andsome points solutions in HCM, Fin, Asset Management  etc Focus seems to be on migrating on-prem Products to be offered on Cloud
    WebSphere Libertyhelps build J2EE apps
    Products for Mobility, App management, Integration, Process Management, Service Desk Management, etc are now part of its Cloud platform
    Quickly catching up with both AWS & Azure
    Advantage of a global DC footprint
    Private Cloud as a Service (PCaaS) offering
    Not leading any segment at this time.
    PCaaS offers a pragmatic view to tap reality of the Hybrid service options
SAP
    SuccessFactors in HCM space, Cloud4Customer in CRM space, Concur in Expense Mgmt, Ariba in SCM/Proc lead the field
    Offers all traditional SAP on-prem products in Fin, Proc, CRM also on Cloud with HANA
    Large customer base.
    SAP HANA has been successfully positioned as PaaS for building new solutions, integrations to on-prem, as well as extending SaaS solutions
    Might not compete as a generic Infra player with AWS, Azure or IBM. But stays focused on offering Infra solutions to its client base to move to Cloud
    End to End Player, however, SAP continues to stay focused as a Business Software company
    SAP has been successful buying its way into SaaS space, with products like SuccessFactors, Concur, Ariba
Netsuite
    Focused on Fin, CRM, Ecom space
    Large SME client base
    Building presence in Manufacturing space
    Providing its tool kit to extend its products & integrate to third party apps
    Not into IaaS play
    Constantly rumored to be an acquisition target
Workday
    Trendsetter in HCM space and has a market leading product
    Has large client base
    Expanded in Financials
    Not into PaaS play
    Not into IaaS Play
    Played the disruptor in the HCM space and forced Oracle & SAP play catching up
Google
    Google Apps for Work Productivity
    No business SaaS products for business functions
    However, Partners offer products built on Google platform
    Offers Dev Platforms, Cloud SDK, Mobile, Commerce & other tools
    Machine Learning Platform & Big DataPlatforms would differentiate Google from the crowd
    Google Cloud Platform
    Late Entrant but doing everything to Playing hard to catch up with AWS & Azure
    Has the size, scale & investments to play long term
    Free Trail offers & price points have driven startups & SME segments to Google
    Partner products, extensions, accelerators would accelerate Google Platform usage


Further updates will be published.  This is simply my point of view & I am open to being corrected.